Team Action ZoneActionTrack team activities
Team Action ZoneThe idea behind everything: a programmable state-machine platform. The fundamental strength of ActionTrack is its architecture.
ActionTrack applies the Alan Turing Universal Machine principle: instead of being built around a fixed set of predefined game formats, it provides basic logical building blocks that can be combined to implement extremely different kinds of behaviour.
In ActionTrack, Checkpoints represent states and Connections define transitions between those states. Together they form state machines.
A single game template can contain countless separate state machines, called Networks, each implementing a particular logical entity, process or game mechanic. These Networks can interact through points, Keys, player and Clan states, Clan Member IDs, task results and other conditions.
This is the reason ActionTrack is exceptionally flexible. Rather than asking:
the ActionTrack approach is closer to:
The designer can then construct that behaviour from states, transitions, conditions and actions.
This underlying architecture makes it possible to build anything from a simple quiz or treasure hunt to sophisticated multiplayer experiences with branching logic, different player roles, resource systems, hidden states, collaborative puzzles and dynamically changing routes.
Many of ActionTrack’s individual features are therefore best understood not as isolated features, but as building blocks of a programmable experience engine.
Checkpoints and Connections can be combined into Networks that implement independent logical processes within the same activity.
A Network may represent, for example:
A template can contain many such Networks working simultaneously.
Combined with conditions based on points, Keys, answers, player identity and other states, ActionTrack can implement highly sophisticated behaviour without requiring every possible game concept to be separately programmed into the platform.
This is one of ActionTrack’s most fundamental advantages over platforms based primarily on a predefined sequence of missions.
Participants can be routed automatically, choose their own routes, or be directed according to their answers, points, Keys and other conditions.
Routing can therefore be part of the game logic itself.
Different decisions can lead to different consequences. A successful answer can open one route while an unsuccessful answer opens another. Resources can unlock alternatives. Players can make strategic choices, and completely different Networks can become available depending on what has happened previously.
The result is not simply a route containing tasks, but a dynamic interactive system.
ActionTrack supports Clans, but teamwork can go considerably deeper than simply combining individual scores.
Each member of a Clan can have their own Clan Member ID. These IDs can determine which Checkpoints, content and capabilities are available to each individual player.
Different members of the same team can therefore experience different states of the game.
For example:
This allows genuine asymmetric multiplayer game design.
Players are not merely standing around one device solving the same task. Their individual roles can be part of the underlying game logic.
ActionTrack’s Clue Challenges use this architecture to create tasks that cannot be solved effectively by one person.
Different members of a team receive different clues on their own devices. Each player’s information is incomplete.
The players must:
No single player has the complete solution.
This creates collaboration by design rather than simply putting several people into the same team.
Communication, listening, deduction and information sharing become actual game mechanics.
For team-building applications, this distinction is particularly important.
ActionTrack does not simply put people into teams. It can make the activity itself require teamwork.
ActionTrack can use AI to evaluate and score suitable participant submissions.
This expands automated gameplay beyond conventional right-or-wrong questions.
Creative tasks such as photographs can be assessed against predefined criteria, enabling participants to receive scores for open-ended challenges without requiring an organiser to manually evaluate every submission.
This combines two traditionally conflicting objectives:
creative freedom for participants + scalable automated operation for organisers.
AI evaluation is particularly powerful when combined with ActionTrack’s state-machine architecture.
An AI-generated score or result can become another input into the activity logic, affecting points, progression, rewards or subsequent gameplay.
ActionTrack supports several fundamentally different types of Checkpoints:
Because all of these are states within the same underlying system, they can be freely combined.
One experience can therefore move between:
outdoor navigation → indoor QR challenge → collaborative puzzle → virtual logic stage → physical movement challenge
without changing platforms.
ActionTrack Keys are more than collectible game objects.
They can function as:
Keys can be personal, shared by a Clan or shared across the entire activity.
They can be created, consumed and used as conditions for entering Checkpoints or taking Connections.
From a state-machine perspective, Keys provide a powerful way for one Network to affect another Network.
For example, completing one mission can grant a Key that changes what becomes possible much later elsewhere in the activity.
This allows complex game systems to be constructed from relatively simple components.
Clan Member IDs, Keys, points and other conditions can be combined to define not only what information players see, but what they are able to do.
This enables role-based game mechanics.
One team member might become:
Roles can also change during the game as the state changes.
This gives designers possibilities closer to sophisticated board games, escape rooms and multiplayer computer games than traditional mobile scavenger hunts.
Tasks can combine text, images, GIFs, audio, video, web content, multiple-choice questions, multiple-answer questions, text answers, numerical answers, lists, photographs and physical challenges.
Several elements can be combined within a single task.
Tasks can therefore range from simple trivia questions to:
The task itself is just one component inside the wider game logic.
Task answers can be evaluated:
This allows the evaluation method to match the task.
Objective tasks can be checked automatically. Creative tasks can use AI. Subjective performances can be judged by a human.
The resulting score can then influence subsequent states and routes.
Scoring can become part of the game logic rather than merely a leaderboard total.
ActionTrack can support:
Points can also function as requirements for accessing future states.
A score can therefore represent both performance and game state.
ActionTrack has been designed to support activities involving large numbers of participants.
The system can automate:
Advanced routing can help distribute participants between locations rather than sending everyone to the same place simultaneously.
This reduces congestion and decreases the amount of event staff required to operate large activities.
During an activity, organisers can monitor participant progress, locations, scores, travelled distances, destinations and tasks awaiting evaluation.
The Controller can also communicate with:
Points and Keys can be changed while the activity is running.
Because Keys and points can affect game states, the Controller can potentially intervene in the experience itself rather than merely observe it.
Activity content is downloaded to the mobile device when participants join.
If network coverage temporarily disappears, much of the activity can continue. Answers and photographs can be stored locally and transferred when connectivity returns.
This is especially valuable for activities operating:
where continuous mobile connectivity cannot be guaranteed.
ActionTrack’s Start Code functionality allows sophisticated activity templates to be converted into customer-operated products.
Depending on permissions, customers can be allowed to:
while the underlying logic and state-machine architecture remain controlled by the activity designer.
A sophisticated product can therefore be created once and delivered repeatedly without requiring TAZ personnel to operate every event.
Templates can be copied, moved geographically, exported, imported and combined with components from other Templates.
The Network concept also encourages modular design.
A particular logical mechanism can be developed once and incorporated into larger experiences.
This makes ActionTrack especially suitable for creating families of products for:
The result is closer to modular software development than repeatedly building individual scavenger hunts from scratch.
ActionTrack is not limited to standard Google or Apple map presentation.
Custom illustrated maps and paths can be incorporated into an activity.
This enables:
The underlying state-machine logic remains the same regardless of how the experience is presented visually.
Designers can define Start Areas, Finish Areas and Forbidden Areas.
Forbidden Areas can warn participants away from inappropriate locations, while the system can guide players towards a predefined Finish Area when an activity ends.
Safety and logistics can therefore be integrated directly into the activity design.
After an activity, organisers can analyse considerably more than a final leaderboard.
ActionTrack can provide:
Results and answers can be exported, photographs downloaded and activities replayed afterwards.
This makes ActionTrack relevant not only for entertainment but also for training, education and facilitated team development.
The most important distinction is that ActionTrack should not primarily be described as a scavenger-hunt platform.
GPS, QR codes, quizzes, photographs and leaderboards are visible features, but they do not explain the deeper capability of the system.
The stronger positioning is:
Its underlying state-machine architecture allows designers to combine:
This is what enables everything else:
ActionTrack uses a universal state-machine approach in which Checkpoints and Connections form programmable Networks, enabling designers to build anything from simple activities to highly sophisticated collaborative multiplayer experiences.
1. Programmable experience engine – state-machine Networks can implement highly sophisticated and reusable game logic.
2. True collaboration by design – individual Clan members can receive different information, Checkpoints and capabilities.
3. Advanced dynamic logic – routes and content can depend on choices, answers, Keys, points, identities and previous events.
4. AI-powered creative challenges – suitable open-ended submissions can be evaluated automatically.
5. Indoor, outdoor and anywhere – GPS, QR, logic and location-independent gameplay coexist in the same architecture.
6. Automated large-event management – routing, scoring, participant tracking and traffic distribution can be handled by the system.
7. Self-run and highly scalable – sophisticated products can be created once and delivered repeatedly.
8. Professional event control and analytics – live management, communication, scoring, results, statistics and post-event analysis.
Looking for more information about our games? Or maybe some specific game? Let us help! Leave us a contact request, or book a meeting with us, and let’s start creating awesome experiences together.